24457 Louis Sheehan2445824459 Louis Sheehan38722 Louis Sheehan38733 Louis Sheehan17230 Louis Sheehan24456 Louis SheehanLouis J. Sheehan 30Louis J. Sheehan 33Louis J. Sheehan 36Louis J. Sheehan 39Louis J. Sheehan 40Louis Sheehan 448833
January, 2010
February, 2010
March, 2010
April, 2010
May, 2010
June, 2010
July, 2010
August, 2010
September, 2010
October, 2010
November, 2010
December, 2010
prenuptial 2.pre.021 Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire
Friday, January 22, 2010 - 9:20 PM
Among the most publicized aspects of singer Paul McCartney's divorce from model Heather Mills was the absence of a prenuptial agreement, even though such documents are often ignored entirely by British courts. In the U.K., courts consider the length of the marriage, the needs of any children, the prior assets and the relative contributions of the parties to the matrimonial property as among the most significant factors when determining the division of property. In the case of Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire  and Mills, almost all of these factors were contested by the both side's attorneys. Mills claimed to have had a significant income from modeling prior to the marriage, but McCartney's income from his career as an entertainer and subsequent investments dwarfed hers. Just how much of a difference was to be a matter of some debate. Mills requested £125 million (approximately $200 million) of McCartney's estate, which her lawyers estimated to be valued at around £850 million ($1.5 billion), but McCartney's attorneys offered her only £15.8 million (about $28 million), and valued McCartney's estate at only £450 million (around $800 million).

Mills, perhaps sensing that the case was going badly for her, dumped a carafe of water over the head of one of McCartney's attorneys during proceedings and also unsuccessfully attempted to have the judgment sealed. The final resolution was largely seen as a victory for McCartney's team. Mills was awarded just over £24 million (about $45 million), significantly more than McCartney's attorneys had initially offered, but a far cry from the hundreds of millions her team had requested. The harshest blow to Mills may have been the judge's opinion of her statements in court: "I am driven to the conclusion that much of her evidence, both written and oral, was not just inconsistent and inaccurate but also less than candid."
<< Navigate to Friday, January 22, 2010 Add New Comment
No records found        
Add New Comment
Your name   
Subject   
Content   
*Required fields


24457 Louis Sheehan|24458|24459 Louis Sheehan|38722 Louis Sheehan|38733 Louis Sheehan|17230 Louis Sheehan|24456 Louis Sheehan|Louis J. Sheehan 30|Louis J. Sheehan 33|Louis J. Sheehan 36|Louis J. Sheehan 39|Louis J. Sheehan 40|Louis Sheehan 448833