|
Saturday, November 07, 2009 - 10:06 AM
In 1992,
Ripperologists were provided a rare opportunity to sharpen their teeth.
Michael Barrett, a scrap metal dealer from Liverpool, came forward with
a diary reputedly written by a cotton broker named James Maybrick, who
died in 1889. In this diary, James Maybrick confesses to being Jack the
Ripper.Barrett says that his friend Tony Devereux
gave him the diary, but Devereux never explained how it had gotten into
his hands. Devereux was dead and his family Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire had no knowledge of the
diary at all. For over 100 years, scholars wondered
why the Ripper murders had begun suddenly in August of 1888 with the
murder of Polly Nichols, and then stopped just as abruptly in November
of that same year with the murder of Mary Kelly. The Maybrick diary, if
it was authentic, provided the answer. If James Maybrick were Jack the Ripper, his death in 1889 would explain why the murders ended when they did. James
Maybrick was a cotton merchant who began his business in London in the
early 1870's. He traveled to the United States to open an office in
Virginia and returned several years later. He had contracted malaria in
the U.S. and was taking a combination of arsenic and strychnine to keep
it under control. The medication was addictive and he continued to take
arsenic until his death.  Florence Chandler before her marriage to James Maybrick Maybrick
brought home with him a beautiful, wealthy and socially prominent wife.
Eighteen-year-old Florence Chandler (Florie) was less than half
Maybrick's age, but they fell in love immediately and married soon
afterwards.
The 1880's brought bad luck to the
business and marriage of the Maybricks. Poor economic conditions in the
U.S. and England hurt them financially at a time when they overextended
themselves. In 1888, James and Florie and their two children moved into
a huge mansion outside Liverpool. James Maybrick escaped his financial
worries with increasing amounts of drugs, arsenic included, plus
another woman. When Florie found that despite their financial straits,
her husband was supporting a mistress and his illegitimate children,
she gave up on him. She took up with a younger man. Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire
 Florence Maybrick In
April of 1889, Florie bought some fly papers and soaked them to get out
the arsenic to prepare a cream for her face, which had broken out just
before some big social event. At the same time, James Maybrick, who was
continuing to take his arsenic powders, became sick and died May 11,
1889.
Florie was charged with murdering her husband
with arsenic. After a very hasty and unfair trial, she was convicted
and sentenced to death by hanging. The judge had not allowed any
evidence of James Maybrick's long arsenic addiction to be introduced
into the trial. She spent 15 years in jail before she was finally
released. The judge in her trial was the father of J.K. Stephen, the
tutor of Prince Albert Victor (Eddy), and who was a Ripper suspect. The
judge died a few years later in a hospital for the insane. While
Maybrick was never a suspect during his life, his alleged diary focused
an enormous amount of scrutiny on him after its discovery in 1992. Many
experts analyzed both the diary and the life of James Maybrick. The
actual volume in which the diary was written was from the Victorian
times, but such volumes are available in antique shops. Quite a few
pages at the beginning of the volume had been removed, suggesting that
it might have been partially used for some other purpose before it
became the Maybrick diary. Several experts claimed the ink was modern. Ripper
expert Martin Fido found many anachronisms in the text and Scotland
Yard determined that the handwriting had been altered to add Victorian
flourishes. More problematic is that there were inaccuracies in the
accounts of the murders that seem to have been taken from newspaper
accounts. For example, Philip Sugden says of the murder of Mary Kelly: We
are told that the various parts of her body were strewn 'all over the
room,' that her severed breasts were placed on the bedside table and
that the killer took the key of the room away with him. None of these
statements are true. John Douglas and Mark Olshaker reject James Maybrick as a Ripper candidate based on his personality and history: Even
more to the point, how does a fifty-year-old man with a family,
children, and no sociopathy suddenly blossom into a disorganized serial
killer? He can't, and doesn't. Anyone who thinks his situation through
enough to decide that he wants to kill prostitutes to get back at his
wife but must do so on trips to another city, where he'll hide out,
stalk women of the night, rip them up, and then return to his own world
and home, would not exactly be disorganized. No one plans that
carefully, then goes into such a frenzy of sexual pathology. Finally,
in 1995, a number of experts who labeled the Maybrick diary a brazen
hoax are backed up by Michael Barrett's confession: "I, Michael Barratt
(sic) was the author of the original diary of 'Jack the Ripper' and my
wife, Anne Barrett, hand wrote it from my typed notes" Even so, the
Maybrick diary is still a subject of controversy, despite the evidence
that it was a forgery. Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire
|