|
Sunday, July 26, 2009 - 8:54 AM
No. 338
FROM: Moscow (Tatekawa)
TO: Washington (Koshi) Action Germany and Italy as Circular
# 118.
April 13, 1941
No number.
From Foreign
Minister Matsuoka:
In these
conversations no reference was made either by them or by us to any relationship
between the Jap-Soviet neutrality pact and the Japanese-German-Italian
Tripartite alliance, nor to the effect of either upon the other. We merely
assumed that the neutrality agreement was being concluded on the premise that
it was taken "for granted" that the Tripartite alliance was a clearly
established fact and that this neutrality pact would not affect or change it in
any way; and they also seemed to take the same attitude. I think there cannot
possibly arise the slightest doubt on that point in the future. Please assure
the Foreign Ministers of the countries to which you are accredited in regard to
this matter at once.
Relayed to
Tokyo, England, America, France.
Trans. 4-15-41
No. 339
FROM: Rome
TO: Moscow
April 12, 1941
# 210.
Message to
Tokyo.
On the 12th,
the Vice Chief of Staff of the entire Army told ANDO that the war against
Greece and Yugoslavia had been even more successful than expected and that
already the Italian troops in Albania had come together with the southern
German army in southern Siberia (in the vicinity of Ochrida, according to
official reports). Due to the concentration of large forces to the north of
Belgrade the main army of the Serbians will be defeated with little action. In
Libya, Tobruk is being besieged, and although the British are trying to render
assistance by bringing warships from Alexandria, its collapse soon is
inevitable. However, the German and Italian armies have not yet reached the
Libyan-Egyptian frontier. When questioned as to whether the Italian and German
forces would go on to capture Alexandria after occupying Cirenaica [a] he
avoided a direct reply.
On this
occasion the above-mentioned officer asked a number of questions about
MATSUOKA's visit to Moscow and Russia's attitude toward Japan. It certainly is
true, he said, that recent relations between Germany and Russia have not been
entirely satisfactory. Doesn't it seem rather strange for Russia to go off and
establish special relations with Japan? To this ANDO replied that Japan, in
accordance with the ideals of the three Axis Powers, is endeavoring to get
Russia to come along, and although difficulties may be encountered in achieving
this, a friendly attitude on the part of Russia for Japan will certainly be a
step in the desired direction.
Relay to
England.
[a] A city in northern Libya.
Trans. 4-15-41
Page A-177
No. 340
FROM: Rio de Janeiro (Ishii)
TO: Buenos Aires (Koshi)
April 1, 1941
# 081.
(Circular, in 2
parts—complete).
Received from
Tokyo as Circular # 760, 31st.
European
American reports.
1. The policy
of England and the U.S. toward Japan is to make existence as difficult as
possible. In stopping petroleum and food from reaching Japan, they intend to
push Japan to the last extremity.Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire
2. Matsuoka's
trip to Europe made a deep impression in England and America. The newspapers
reported it as having something to do with Japan's southern expansion and said
that Japan would do as Germany ordered -----.
3. America's
passage of the Aid-To-Britain bill is leading America to the brink of war. As
an answer Germany is stepping up her submarine war and England's shipping
losses have increased sharply. According to British reports they are losing up
to 20,000 tons a day. This is causing an acute food shortage in Britain.
In the Balkans,
Russo-German relations seem to be the key to the Bulgarian and Turkish
problems. However, what course the Soviet will take from now on is a profound
secret.
Trans. 4-3-41
No. 341
FROM: Tokyo
TO: Berlin
(Revised Translation)
April 17, 1941
# 873.
(Circular)
Received from
London as # 260.
The official
reaction in Great Britain toward the Japanese-Soviet neutrality pact was at
first that in view of the exerting circumstances the pact was an effort on the
part of Russia to strengthen her ties with Germany. However, later (partly due
to the reaction produced in America) the pact was viewed as an effort on the
part of Russia to encourage Japan to expand southward and thus come immediately
into conflict with Great Britain and the U.S., and thus the pact produced no
small shock. Thus, a conflict between Russia and Germany was not a thing to be
hoped for in the immediate future. All of this grows out of an anxiety lest
there be some secret understanding in the pact and lest Japan, Russia, and
Germany have a tacit understanding in regard to the East and West.
I explained
that the main purpose of the pact was, in case of necessity, to promote peace
between the three countries, in particular to maintain peace in the Pacific,
and that the pact had no other purpose than to promote peace and order in the
Orient, and that Japan was not in cahoots with any other country.
Relayed to
Washington and Europe.
Trans. 4-21-41
Page A-178
No. 342
FROM: San Francisco (Muto)
TO: Tokyo (Gaimudaijin)
April 15, 1941
# 057.
(Abstract)
Local
newspapers report that America is shocked by the neutrality pact and
dissatisfied with Russia.
Trans. 4-19-41
No. 343
FROM: Ottawa (Yoshizawa)
TO: Tokyo (Foreign Minister)
April 15, 1941
# 049.
(Abstract)
To say the
least, the establishment of the Jap-Soviet neutrality pact has produced a great
shock here. Local newspapers are playing it up.
Trans. 4-19-41
No. 344
FROM: Batavia (Daihyo)
TO: Tokyo (Gaimudaijin)
April 7, 1941
# 151.
Matsuoka's
speeches in Berlin and Rome were wired here and produced no small shock.
However, for my own information, I wish you would wire me the intent of his
speeches.
Trans. 4-19-41
No. 345
FROM: Nanking
TO: Tokyo
April 8, 1941
# 212.
On the 7th, O
SHU SEKI told HIDAKA in substance the following:
1. Judging from
varied reports concerning the general situation, no notable change can be
observed in the attitude of the Chungking officials. CHIANG KAI SHEK maintains
his challenging attitude and is appealing for economic assistance. He appears
to be determined to continue the struggle, all the while awaiting a favorable
turn in the situation revolving about the European war. It is remarkable to
what extent such organs as the High Commission for National Defense heed every
order of CHIANG KAI SHEK.
2. The recent
council meeting held here came to two conclusions after considerable
discussion, namely:
a. That the
military power of the Chungking government has markedly decreased;
b. That they
will avoid a clash with the Japanese army.
CHIANG is
endeavoring to rebuild his aerial army with assistance from the United States
and, following the example of the European war, he plans to take the offensive
against Japan in the air.
Page A-179
On the same day
SHU FUTSU KAI told HIDAKA that Foreign Minister MATSUOKA's trip to Europe is
worrying Chungking very much and, since his assumption of office in Moscow, the
Chinese Ambassador (?) has not been able to get a single interview with STALIN,
and there is a current report that STALIN has washed his hands of CHIANG. The
resignation of O CHO KEI as Vice Chief of Foreign Relations was of his own
volition and the resignation of the Chief Private Secretary to the High
Commission for National Defense was for the purpose of better serving O SHU
SEKI. SHU FUTSU KAI in general had about the same thing to say as O SHU SEKI.Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire
Relayed to
Peking and Shanghai.
Trans. 4-21-41
No. 346
FROM: Hsinking
TO: Peking, Nanking, and Shanghai
April 18, 1941
# 72.
Circular.
Message to Tokyo as # 207.
Strictly
Secret.
The recent
Soviet-Japanese neutrality agreement and proclamation seem to have had not a
little effect upon the Manchukuoan officialdom and the new Peoples' Government
in that it has removed the menace from the north. There are not a few who are
greatly relieved. However, there is one group of important persons who believe
that the Soviet schemes to cause a Japanese move toward the south, thus opening
the way for Japanese-American hostilities. They are, therefore, of the opinion
that a great deal of caution should be exercised.
That is all for
the present.
Relayed to
Russia, Peking, Nanking and Shanghai.
Trans. 4-21-41
No. 347
FROM: Rome
TO: Tokyo
April 19, 1941
# 233.
Regarding my
message # 211 [a].
According to
information received from the same source, the Apostolic Delegate in the U.S.
was instructed by the Vatican to call on the President of the U.S. and relay
the following opinions of the Pope to him:
The Pope got
the impression that the Japanese-Soviet neutrality pact was brought about by
Japan in her determination to bring about a change in Soviet-Chinese relations.
Japan has made
her position in the Far East as strong as her above-mentioned determination. It
is important at this time to strengthen Japan's desire to maintain peace in the
Far East.
In this regard,
it would seem more favorable if the U.S. took a more friendly and cooperative
attitude with Japan, instead of one of antagonism. It would be of advantage to
the U.S. if she would aid Japan in her efforts to attain a definite position.
From the view
point of aid to Britain, it would seem as if it would be to the interest of the
U.S. to avoid a conflict with Japan.
Page A-180
The Vatican is
prepared to give its wholehearted support to promoting a peace between Japan
and Chiang Kai-Shek. There is little doubt that there is no motive except the
above, behind the dispatching of a special envoy to the Vatican by China.
It is the
Vatican's hope in other words, that the U.S. does everything in its power to
prevent the war from becoming wider in scope, and instead that it will wield
its influence in behalf of promoting peace, etc.
Relayed to
Berlin, Moscow and Washington.
[a] Not yet translated.
Trans. 4-21-41
No. 348
FROM: Tokyo (Matsuoka)
TO: Berlin (Koshi)
May 1, 1941
# 363.
Regarding your
# 467 [a].
On the 24th, at
the Privy Council, I simply said in reply to a question put to me by a Privy
Councilor:
It goes without
saying that one of the chief objectives of the Soviet-Japanese Neutrality Pact
is the settlement of the China Incident, looking toward a general peace.
However, if the above intention leaks out to outsiders it may have an
unfavorable effect on our plans. Therefore, I ask that this information be
strictly limited to this group only."
I have never
made the statement mentioned in the press, regarding our government's policy
towards Chungking.
[a] Not available, dated about 1
May, 1941.
Trans. 5-7-41
|